I am ready for the inevitable lawyer bashing but... Can you be more precise in what you mean by "should." Your blog topic had Seana and I talking this morning and we agreed that one could read "should" in the question several different ways. Is that "should" based on the available candidates, based on B.O.'s level of experience, based on his race/gender, based on his "Messianic" qualities (see above), based on the state of the world, or all of the above...
Messianic is a combination of Mess and Titanic, right? That's what this country would be if BO got in. On the plus side; EVERY member of the BM family would be instantly wealthy........since he considers anybody with an income wealthy so he can tax 'em to death.
7 comments:
there are many Barak backers in this family...can you say Messianic?
I did not realize there were any other choices. McCain is the next President.
The better question. Should Hillary somehow win, how many times does William F. Buckley Jr. role over in his grave?
NO
I am ready for the inevitable lawyer bashing but... Can you be more precise in what you mean by "should." Your blog topic had Seana and I talking this morning and we agreed that one could read "should" in the question several different ways. Is that "should" based on the available candidates, based on B.O.'s level of experience, based on his race/gender, based on his "Messianic" qualities (see above), based on the state of the world, or all of the above...
Are you guys suggesting "should" and "would" on the Post be reversed? Or would it be best if I should replace both words with "could"
Editors...I LOve Them !
Messianic is a combination of Mess and Titanic, right? That's what this country would be if BO got in. On the plus side; EVERY member of the BM family would be instantly wealthy........since he considers anybody with an income wealthy so he can tax 'em to death.
Post a Comment